Why should I trust a book written by someone who admits he was 'mischievous, talkative, cynical, and critical' with a 'bad intellect'? The author seems to be admitting he's an unreliable narrator.

The author's candid self-description in Chapter 2 is a key part of his narrative of personal transformation, intended to bolster the book's message rather than undermine it. By admitting his past self was "mischievous, talkative, cynical, and critical," and prone to argumentation, he highlights the profound impact Sai Baba had on him. His journey from an arrogant, logic-driven individual to a devoted follower named Hemadpant serves as a testament to the Satguru's power. As Chapter 2 implies, this transformation is the very foundation of his authority to write the book, demonstrating that even a cynical mind can be changed through the grace and teachings of the Guru.