Why is the biography by Vasudevanand Saraswati Maharaj considered an inferior work compared to others?

The text from Chapter 0 does not characterize the biography by Shri Samarth Sadguru Vasudevanand Saraswati Maharaj as an inferior work. Rather, it offers a specific set of observations. It describes the work as "detailed, scholarly, and filled with various poetic meters and ornaments." The primary distinctions made are that it "does not yet seem to have become as famous as the one written by Shri Saraswati Gangadhar" and that, because it was an autobiography written by the Maharaj himself, it cannot be categorized alongside biographies written by third-party authors like Saraswati Gangadhar and Annasaheb Dabholkar. The text comments on its fame and classification, not its quality.