Why does the text advise against argumentation, and what are the consequences of having a logic-driven mind?

The text strongly advises against argumentation, linking it directly to spiritual ignorance. Chapter 2 states that where there is a mind for argumentation, there is an abundance of ignorance and Maya. Such a mind is characterized by bad thoughts and false logic, rendering a person unfit for the pursuit of self-knowledge. Instead of finding peace, such individuals are said to be devoured by ignorance and experience unhappiness in both this world and the next. The author is told explicitly to avoid dualistic explanations, not to establish his own side, and not to refute the other, labeling such efforts as useless.