The text places a strong emphasis on the Guru because the relationship is central to spiritual progress. As Chapter 19 states, "The sense of difference like 'I and Thou' is the wall between Guru and disciple; without tearing it down, the state of non-duality is certainly difficult to reach." The book suggests that attaining "Guru-strength like Sai’s" requires strong fortune and that the Guru, like Govinda in the Bhagavad Gita, provides for the well-being and security of those who think of him with undivided attention. This focus is not meant to invalidate other figures, but to highlight the immense power and support found in surrendering to one's Guru, who acts as the ultimate protector.
Why does the narrative always pivot back to the Guru, Sai Baba, even when the query is about something else, like another saint? Is it wrong to focus on other holy figures?
📖 Chapter 19