Why does the author seem to think that even a place like heaven isn't worth desiring?

The author's critique of desiring heaven, as detailed in Chapter 37, is based on its perceived spiritual emptiness. The text points out that the conventional heavenly abode is merely a place for sensual enjoyment, which can be attained through difficult penance and charity. However, the author questions the value of such a place if it lacks the essential element of devotion, specifically the remembrance and chanting of Lord Narayana's or Govinda's name. The core argument is that any realm, whether it be heaven or hell, is ultimately deficient if it does not facilitate a loving connection with the Divine. True fulfillment comes from devotion, not from the temporary sensual pleasures of a celestial realm.