The author grapples with a profound paradox in Chapter 49. He asserts that the Sadguru's greatness is so vast and inexpressible that even sacred texts like the Vedas and Puranas grew weary trying to praise it. He notes that transcendental speech cannot grasp the Guru's essence, making silence the most authentic form of praise. However, he cannot adhere to this silence because, as he puts it, "each quality of Sai makes me forget that silence." The bliss he experiences from Sai's divine play, or Leela, is so overwhelming that he feels compelled to share it, comparing it to sharing a sweet delicacy at a feast to double the joy. Thus, the irresistible love and grace of Sai override the logical conclusion that silence is best.
Why does the author of the Satcharitra state that silence is the best praise for a Sadguru, yet find himself unable to remain silent?
📖 Chapter 49