Why does the author of Chapter 37 express disdain for the conventional idea of a heavenly home?

Chapter 37 critiques the pursuit of a conventional heavenly abode by questioning its spiritual value. The text argues that a heaven attained through difficult sacrifices and penance is ultimately just a place for sensual enjoyment. Its critical flaw is the potential lack of devotion and remembrance of God, posing the question: "Where there is no chanting of Govinda's name, what is the use of such a place?" The chapter goes so far as to state that in terms of sensual pleasure, there is no real difference between heaven and hell. This perspective, articulated in Chapter 37, dismisses the desire for such a temporary realm in favor of the higher goal of realizing one's unity with the divine.