Was Hemadpant's cynical and logic-driven mind a result of his education in Western philosophy, according to the text?

The provided excerpts from Chapter 2 do not state that Hemadpant's mindset was a result of education in Western philosophy. The text describes his initial character as 'mischievous, talkative, cynical, and critical,' with a 'bad intellect and a logic-driven mind' that was 'prone to argumentation.' This description is used to illustrate his state before understanding the Satguru's greatness and surrendering his ego. The source of these traits is not attributed to any specific educational system or philosophical tradition, but rather presented as a personal characteristic of arrogance and pride in his own wisdom.