This text seems to be against critical thinking, claiming that argumentation leads to ignorance. Isn't that just a way to demand blind faith?

The passages in Chapter 2 critique a specific type of intellectual activity in the context of spiritual seeking, rather than rejecting critical thinking entirely. Sai Baba is quoted as saying, "Where there is a mind for argumentation, there is abundance of ignorance and Maya," and advises against engaging in dualistic explanations. The text posits that for the purpose of attaining self-knowledge and spiritual bliss, an argumentative and ego-driven mindset is a significant obstacle. As described in Chapter 2, this approach leads to "bad thoughts and false logic," preventing happiness. The book suggests that faith and devotion are more effective tools for this specific goal, framing argumentation as a "useless effort" in the pursuit of the formless Consciousness.