The text seems to strongly discourage argumentation and logic. Is it promoting blind faith over critical thinking?

The passages from Chapter 2 present a very specific viewpoint on argumentation. The text states, "Where there is a mind for argumentation, there is abundance of ignorance and Maya," and that such a mindset is filled with "bad thoughts and false logic." It argues that this approach makes a person unfit for self-knowledge and leads only to unhappiness. Rather than promoting blind faith, the text frames the rejection of dualistic explanations and argumentation as a necessary discipline for spiritual advancement. It's positioned not as an attack on all logic, but as a critique of ego-driven intellectualism that obstructs the path to self-realization and harmony between the soul and Shiva.