The text seems to present a contradiction. How can Sai Baba be described as both completely 'absorbed in the Self' and simultaneously 'subservient to his devotees'? Isn't being self-absorbed the opposite of being subservient?

Chapter 48 presents this apparent contradiction to illustrate the multifaceted nature of a Sadguru. While Sai Baba had achieved complete victory over the mind and was always absorbed in the Self, his pure love for his followers led him to act in a way that appeared subservient. This was a deliberate act, a vow he took to show his devotees that he is their beloved. As described in Chapter 48, he is both 'beyond dualities' and the 'Remover of the afflictions of worldly existence.' His subservience is not a sign of weakness but an expression of his boundless love and a method to make himself accessible to those who seek refuge in him.