The text seems to condemn argumentation and logic. Why is having a 'mind for argumentation' seen as so negative from a spiritual perspective?

In Chapter 2, a mind focused on argumentation is directly linked to spiritual hindrance. Sai Baba's teachings, as recorded, explain that 'Where there is a mind for argumentation, there is abundance of ignorance and Maya.' This state of being is characterized by 'bad thoughts and false logic,' which ultimately prevents one from achieving self-knowledge. Instead of leading to truth, this intellectual pride only leads to unhappiness. Baba advises against establishing one's own side or refuting another's, calling it a 'useless effort.' The author himself reflects on his past self as being 'prone to argumentation' as a negative trait, implying that this approach closes one off to the Satguru's greatness and the deeper experience of faith.