The text says Sai has 'no name or village,' which seems contradictory. How does Chapter 36 explain this aspect of his being?

The statement in Chapter 36 that Sai Baba has 'no name or village' is a poetic and philosophical description of his transcendent nature, not a literal claim of anonymity. The text frames this within the context of his 'infinite glory' and his ability to remain 'distant and detached from his name' while simultaneously causing 'various events to occur.' This suggests his essence is not confined by earthly identifiers like a name or a place of origin. As Chapter 36 explains, he is the 'incarnation of the knowledge of Truth' who shows realization as a witness. This characterization points to a universal, omnipresent consciousness that operates beyond the limitations of a conventional identity, even as he is worshipped by countless devotees.