The text says Sai Baba has 'no name or village.' How can this be true when he is known as Sai Baba of Shirdi? Is the text contradicting itself?

Chapter 36 describes Sai Baba as one 'who has no name or village' to emphasize his transcendent and unattached spiritual nature, highlighting that he is beyond worldly identities. This is a poetic description of his state, indicating his detachment from ego and material connections. As the chapter states, he is 'distant and detached from his name' yet 'causes various events to occur.' This isn't a literal contradiction but a way to express his infinite glory and his identity as an incarnation of Truth, not confined by a physical location or a given name.