This apparent contradiction is resolved by understanding the different contexts of Sai Baba's advice in Chapter 3. The instruction, "Do not shoo away (had-had) anyone, be it a dog, pig, or fly," promotes a sense of universal compassion and the understanding that no being comes to us without a connection. On the other hand, the warning to avoid people who have "abandoned religious conduct" is a practical measure for spiritual protection. Baba refers to such individuals as "very dangerous," implying their negative influence can hinder one's spiritual progress. Therefore, it is not a contradiction but a nuanced teaching: one should cultivate inner compassion for all beings while being discerning about close associations to safeguard one's own spiritual journey.
The text says not to shoo away a dog or pig, but also to stay away from people who have abandoned religious conduct. Isn't this a contradiction in Baba's teachings?
📖 Chapter 3