The text mentions that the passing of a body is not an end. Can you elaborate on this idea using the provided analogies?

Chapter 37 explains that death is not a final annihilation. It uses an analogy: if a pot is broken with a stone, only its form is destroyed, not its existence. The 'pot-existence' continues to be present in the broken pieces. Similarly, the passing of someone's body does not result in nothingness. The text emphasizes that the effect is not separate from its cause, and the dissolution of an effect, like the body, is eternally established in its underlying existence. Therefore, physical death is merely a change in form, not an end to being.