Chapter 4 explains that the nature of Sai is beyond verbal description, similar to how the tongue can know the taste of sugar but cannot translate that experience into words for another. The text suggests that attempting to narrate His qualities leads the mind to a state of stillness, or Samadhi, and that 'firm silence is best.' True understanding, therefore, is not an intellectual exercise. It is an experience that comes from the Sadguru Himself, who gives the inspiration to describe the indescribable. Lacking that, the determined means of connection is to bow with body, speech, and mind.
The text mentions that in describing God, 'firm silence is best.' How can we understand the nature of Sai if words ultimately fail?
📖 Chapter 4