The text mentions a 'heavenly home' but seems to dismiss it. Why is the conventional idea of heaven considered not worth desiring?

According to the insights in Chapter 37, the conventional abode of heaven, which might be attained through difficult sacrifices, penance, and charity, is ultimately undesirable from a spiritual standpoint. The primary reason given is that it 'lacks the remembrance of Lord Narayana.' The text critiques this version of heaven as 'merely a place for sensual enjoyment.' It pointedly asks, 'Where there is no chanting of Govinda's name, what is the use of such a place?' This suggests that any state or place, even heaven, is spiritually empty if it does not foster a connection with the divine, making it, as Chapter 37 implies, no different from any other realm of sensual pleasure.