The Satcharitra describes Sai Baba as a 'holy incarnation beyond both' Hindu and Muslim identities. What specific paradoxes are cited in Chapter 7 to support this profound statement?

Chapter 7 provides a wealth of evidence to portray Sai Baba as an incarnation who transcended religious categorization. It notes that if one called Him a Hindu, He looked like a Yavana (Muslim), but if called a Muslim, He had the noble marks of a Hindu and, significantly, His ears were pierced. Conversely, if considered a Hindu, His circumcision was evident and He lived in a mosque. This mosque, however, housed a Hindu sacred fire (Dhuni) and was a place for bells and bhajans. This constant interplay of opposing signs and actions led the author to conclude that He was a holy incarnation beyond both labels.