In Chapter 2, the author compares his work to that of previous saintly biographers. Who are these figures and what is the significance of the comparison?

In Chapter 2, the author draws a parallel between his own undertaking and the work of past hagiographers to frame his role as that of a chosen instrument. He specifically mentions Mahipati, who was inspired in the year 1700 (Shaka) to write biographies of saints. The author then points to Das Ganu, who performed a similar service in the year 1800 (Shaka) by writing Bhakta-Lilamrut and Santa-Kathamrut. By referencing these revered figures, the author suggests a divine tradition where saints themselves arrange for their stories to be written through devoted individuals. As Chapter 2 implies, he sees himself as continuing this sacred service, believing that Sai Baba is the true author guiding his hand.