The Sri Sai Satcharitra presents a unique view on its own completeness. Chapter 50 suggests its purpose is not to be an exhaustive catalog of all saints, but to guide the devotee toward a specific spiritual realization. The text emphasizes, "We should attain that non-dual devotion; this is what we ask of Sai." It further posits that the reader, the act of reading, and the subject should be viewed as a single unified state, with Sai as the ultimate source. From this perspective, the book is considered complete in its function, which is to help the devotee's heart become pure and to allow the "tendencies of the senses" to "become Sai-form."
If the book doesn't mention a particular holy person, doesn't that represent a significant omission or flaw in the text?
๐ Chapter 50