How does the text contrast a mind given to argumentation with one open to self-knowledge?

The text in Chapter 2 draws a very sharp contrast between these two mindsets. A mind focused on argumentation is described as being filled with "abundance of ignorance and Maya," "bad thoughts and false logic." Such a person is deemed unfit for self-knowledge and destined for unhappiness. The text explicitly advises against engaging in dualistic explanations or trying to refute others. This is contrasted with the path to self-knowledge, which requires dissolving the ego. The author even uses his own past self as an example, describing his former "logic-driven mind" and pride in his own wisdom as negative traits that he possessed before understanding the Satguru's greatness.