How does the author in Chapter 2 draw parallels between their work and the work of other saintly biographers like Mahipati and Das Ganu?

In Chapter 2, the author establishes a lineage of inspired biographical writing to contextualize their own work. The text mentions how Mahipati, in the year 1700 (Shaka), was inspired by saints to write their biographies. Similarly, Das Ganu was chosen for this service in the year 1800 (Shaka), composing works like *Bhakta-Lilamrut* and *Santa-Kathamrut*. By referencing these historical precedents, the author suggests that they, too, are an instrument being used for a divine purpose. They state that the Lord or Saints hold the author's hand, writing their own story and merely keeping their hand on the author's head, thus framing their own writing as a continuation of this sacred tradition.