How does Chapter 29 contrast Sai Baba's consistent generosity with the unpredictable nature of his specific actions?

Chapter 29 presents an interesting contrast. On one hand, it establishes Sai Baba as being of a consistently "generous disposition," steadfast in charity, and compassionate to the poor. His fame for distributing money was widespread. On the other hand, the chapter emphasizes that his specific actions were entirely unpredictable. He might give money, a sweet, or nothing at all, and he did not give to all who came seeking alms. This narrative, as presented in Chapter 29, suggests that while his core nature was one of immense generosity, the manifestation of that charity was a divine play, a blessing bestowed upon the fortunate whose auspicious time had come, rather than a predictable transaction.