How does Baba's statement about being detached from wealth reconcile with his action of demanding Dakshina from one of the Goa visitors?

Chapter 36 illustrates how Sai Baba's professed detachment reconciles with his actions. While he explicitly states his detachment from wealth—'What house do I have, or what family life? Why would I need wealth?'—his demand for Dakshina is not for personal gain. He explains that 'Mother Masjid demands what is owed, and the giver becomes free from debt.' This reframes the act as that of a divine arbiter facilitating the settlement of a karmic debt, not a personal transaction. The chapter emphasizes that debt is inescapable, and Baba's role, while seemingly contradictory, is to cause these events to occur while remaining personally detached from their material aspects.