In Chapter 36, Madhavrao, also known as Shama, directly questioned Sai Baba about his seemingly inconsistent behavior. Seeing Baba accept a smaller, requested amount from one man while rejecting a larger, voluntary offering from his friend, Shama asked why there was such partiality. He expressed his confusion, pointing out that Baba's actions caused disappointment for the man whose offering was returned. Shama even stated, "If I were in your position, I wouldn't act this way," highlighting his bewilderment at Baba favoring a small sum over a larger one.
How did Shama confront Baba about his 'partiality' towards the two visitors from Goa?
๐ Chapter 36