From the perspective presented in Chapter 37, why is a heaven focused on sensual enjoyment considered an unworthy goal?

From the philosophical standpoint presented in Chapter 37, a heaven that is merely a place for sensual enjoyment is deemed undesirable primarily because it lacks the most essential spiritual component: the remembrance and chanting of God's name. The text pointedly asks, 'Where there is no chanting of Govinda's name, what is the use of such a place?' This chapter of the Satcharitra argues that a heavenly home attained through difficult rituals is ultimately meaningless if it is devoid of devotion to Lord Narayana. It suggests that in terms of providing sensual pleasure, there is no significant difference between heaven, hell, or earth, making the pursuit of such a transient reward a distraction from the true goal of liberation.