The absence of a name does not diminish a saint's importance; rather, it highlights the Satcharitra's specific focus. According to Chapter 50, the primary goal is singular: 'Let steady devotion to Sai be firmly attached; this is our supreme attainment.' The text even states that devotees have no desire for the 'four types of liberation,' emphasizing the all-encompassing nature of devotion to Sai. The Satcharitra is not intended as a comprehensive list but as a potent tool for awakening devotion to one particular Saint, Sai Baba, through whom the heart becomes pure. As Chapter 50 notes, Sai is forever complete, and the stories serve to unite all tendencies of the senses into a 'Sai-form' state.
Does the absence of a saint's name in the Satcharitra imply that their importance is diminished or that they are not recognized within this tradition?
π Chapter 50