Chapter 50 uses several comparisons to describe Sai Baba. Why are comparisons to the sun and moon ultimately deemed inadequate?

According to Chapter 50, conventional celestial comparisons fall short of capturing Sai Baba's true nature. The author considers comparing Sai to the sun but concludes it is unfit because the sun eventually sets, implying an end or a period of absence. Similarly, a comparison to the moon is rejected because the moon wanes and is not always full. In contrast, the chapter asserts that 'Sai is forever complete,' signifying his eternal, unchanging, and ever-present perfection. These failed comparisons serve to elevate Sai beyond the transient phenomena of the natural world, highlighting his supreme and constant state.