Chapter 50 seems to dismiss Hemadpant's role. Can you elaborate on Hemadpant's personal philosophies and how they differed from Sai's, based on this chapter?

Chapter 50 does not elaborate on Hemadpant's personal philosophies or present them as being in contrast to Sai's. Instead, it minimizes his role as the author to emphasize a spiritual point. The text instructs the reader to "Leave aside Hemadpant, for he is not the doer of this Satcharitra," framing him as just a "nominal cause." According to this chapter, the true source of the words is Sai himself: "In this, there is no one other than Sai who makes the words speak." The purpose is to guide the reader towards a non-dual understanding where Sai is the speaker, the subject, and the listener, rather than to analyze Hemadpant's personal views.