Chapter 37 describes Baba as both a "personification of detachment" and someone adorned with gold and emeralds. How does the text reconcile these seemingly contradictory aspects of His nature?

Chapter 37 presents a fascinating paradox in Sai Baba's nature, describing Him as both the "personification of detachment" and yet adorned with worldly ornaments like gold and emerald necklaces. The text reconciles this by explaining that for Him, these decorations held no intrinsic value. It poses the rhetorical question, "for Him who is the personification of detachment, why the emerald necklaces?" The answer provided is that He accepted them not for Himself, but to fulfill the love and celebratory desires of His devotees. When an offering was made, "He extends His neck and fulfills the celebration of the devotees," showing that His actions were a manifestation of His grace and love, not an attachment to material wealth.