Can you explain the philosophical concept of the narrator's role and Sai's detachment as presented in Chapter 36?

Chapter 36 delves into a profound philosophical perspective on divine action and ego. The narrator explicitly diminishes their own role, stating, "Enough of this 'I-ness' (ego) of the speaker," and posits that the "playful Sai himself takes over and makes his own qualities heard." This suggests a state where the devotee becomes a mere instrument for the divine will. Furthermore, Chapter 36 describes Sai as being "indifferent to the 'I am He' (So-ham) attitude" and "staying distant and detached from his name," even while he is the cause of all events. This illustrates the advanced concept of a being who is the ultimate actor yet remains completely unattached to the actions, a key theme in spiritual realization.