Can you elaborate on the paradoxical descriptions of Sai Baba's nature and identity as presented in the source material?

Chapter 36 presents a complex and seemingly paradoxical view of Sai Baba's nature. He is described as someone who has "no name or village" yet possesses "infinite glory." While he is the "incarnation of the knowledge of Truth," he remains "distant and detached from his name," causing events to occur without direct involvement. The text mentions he is indifferent to the "I am He" (So-ham) attitude, yet he is also the "swan in the lake of the Supreme." This suggests a being who is both immanent and transcendent, formless yet able to show various forms, and detached from ego while being the central figure of devotion for countless beings whom he has redeemed.