Yes, Chapter 0 acknowledges that writing the biographies of great men, such as unique politicians, brave warriors, or extraordinary jurists, can be considered a form of Guru service and also public service. However, the text immediately qualifies this by outlining its significant limitations. This type of service is described as being of a worldly nature, and its importance and fruits are not eternal but are limited by space and time. Because it is also considered to be rooted in self-interest, it does not yield the spiritual fruits that come from more spiritually focused service, such as writing about saints or one's Sadguru.
Can writing about a famous historical figure be considered a form of Guru service based on this text, and what are its limitations?
๐ Chapter 0