Based on Chapter 36, can you analyze the seemingly paradoxical nature of Sai Baba as both a detached renunciant and an active force in the world?

Chapter 36 presents a fascinating paradox in Sai Baba's character. On one hand, he is depicted as a supreme renunciant, being "distant and detached from his name" and having no specific village, embodying indifference to the egoistic "I am He" attitude. On the other hand, he is an incredibly active and interventionist force. The text states he "causes various events to occur" and can "turn a beggar into a king in a moment with the play of his eyebrows." This duality shows him as an incarnation of Truth who acts as a witness yet simultaneously bestows grace, shows various forms, and creates inconceivable events, demonstrating that his detachment does not preclude his infinite power to act in the world for his devotees.