Analyze the friend's initial criticism of the 'Fakir.' What does it reveal about his worldview, and how did subsequent events prove him wrong?

The friend's initial criticism reveals a purely materialistic and dismissive worldview. He mocked Sai Baba as a 'Fakir' who, having washed his hands of worldly affairs, could offer no valuable advice on business. In his mind, someone who filled their belly by begging couldn't possibly interfere in a 'clear business' deal. This perspective shows a complete lack of faith in anything beyond tangible profit and loss. However, as Chapter 25 narrates, events proved his narrow worldview profoundly wrong. The 'clear business' led to his financial ruin, while the 'Fakir's' guidance saved Damu Anna. The friend was forced to admit his own wisdom was 'in vain' and that the Saint's mercy was great, a humbling experience that completely invalidated his earlier scorn.